The unions' other battleground: professional redeployment
By Camille Frati, Misch Pautsch, Lex Kleren Switch to French for original article
Another urgent matter has been added to the Minister of Labour's already busy social agenda, as the Constitutional Court has ruled on an inconsistency in the legislation on professional redeployment. Will the Minister be satisfied with amendments, or will he launch the in-depth reform demanded by the unions?
A construction worker who can no longer carry heavy loads, a secretary who can no longer sit behind her computer screen all day, a cleaner who has become ill from breathing the toxic fumes of cleaning products: regardless of the sector, all workers may find themselves unable to continue their job for health reasons. This is what professional redeployment is for, introduced into Luxembourg's labour code by the law of 25 July 2002 on incapacity for work and professional reintegration. "Redeployment was invented as part of the round table on pensions, " recalls Carlos Pereira, member of the OGBL's executive committee. "Many of the issues raised during the tripartite talks concerned the definition of disability and fitness or unfitness for work. The basic philosophy was that it was a good idea that helped a lot of people, but it was written too quickly." This is evidenced by the many more or less substantial revisions. The last major reform dates back to 2016, and a few more measures were amended at the end of 2020.
You want more? Get access now.
-
One-year subscription€185.00/year
-
Monthly subscription€18.50/month
-
Zukunftsabo for subscribers under the age of 26€120.00/year
Already have an account?
Log in