A second mum, yet unrecognised – where do we stand on the PMA Act?

By Camille FratiLex Kleren Switch to French for original article

For lesbian couples having a child via medically assisted reproduction, the non-birth mother is still forced to adopt her own child to gain parental recognition. This situation has been criticised by both lawyers and MPs, whilst the promise of automatic recognition from birth remains bogged down in paralysis of filiation reform.

David and Lisa rely on medically assisted reproduction (PMA) to expand their family. The child is born, and David goes to the registry office in his local authority, which stamps the birth certificate listing both parents. Marie and Simone rely on PMA to expand their family. The child is born, but on their Luxembourg birth certificate, only the name of Marie, who gave birth, appears. Simone will have to wait three months to start adoption proceedings and, several months later, she will finally become a mother in the eyes of the law. "There is discrimination, unequal treatment between heterosexual and same-sex couples who are, in fact, in the same situation, " says Deidre Du Bois, avocate à la Cour and co-founder and partner at the law firm Dupong Krieps Du Bois Videira. "I recently met with a couple and the mother told me that it is still deeply upsetting to be merely the registered parent when she conceived the child with her partner. It was truly a project they undertook together, and one of them is currently reduced to nothing at all. She has no rights over this child. If her partner were to die tomorrow, in theory, the child could be taken into care and taken away from her."

You want more? Get access now.

  • One-year subscription

    €185.00
    /year
  • Monthly subscription

    €18.50
    /month
  • Zukunftsabo for subscribers under the age of 26

    €120.00
    /year

Already have an account?

Log in